Re: WS-Addressing and URIs

[www-archive...]

On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 19:19, Mark Baker wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:05:38PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 09:50, Mark Baker wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I believe there to be a rather large Web-architectural flaw with the
> > > recent WS-Addressing submission[1] that I wanted to raise with the TAG.
> > 
> > I'd expect you to bring it to the attention of the TAG if you want
> > one of the TAG's documents changed. I don't see in your message
> > any request to change a TAG document or even to write a new one.
> 
> Sorry, I intended it to be implicit in my message that I'd like to raise
> an issue.  My apologies for not making that clear.

A new web architecture issue? I still don't see one.

> > Am I missing something?
> > 
> > Where does the WS-Addressing submission direct feedback? Hmm... I don't
> > see anything in the SOTD except the generic link to the list
> > of acknowledged submissions... if you know enough to look for it,
> > you can find the team comment, where Hugo writes...
> > 
> > "Feedback on this technology is encouraged on the www-ws@w3.org mailing
> > list (public archive)."
> >   -- http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/05/Comment
> 
> Thanks, I'll keep that in mind.  But I think I'm working within the
> bounds of documented process to request that the TAG consider
> architectural issues with member submissions.  Am I mistaken?

Yes. The TAG has no responsibility for submissions, as far as I know.

> FWIW, I did talk about this with Hugo, but he's been away, and it's
> my understanding that discussion is well under way to charter a WG to
> develop a WS-Addressing-like specification.  I didn't want to end up
> waiting too long to do that.

Again, I don't see how that's the TAG's business.

> Mark.
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2004 01:41:37 UTC