W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2003

RE: SOAP 1.2 PR Documents

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 13:03:03 -0700
Message-ID: <7C083876C492EB4BAAF6B3AE0732970E0B21160B@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Noah Mendelsohn" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Carine Bournez \(E-mail\)" <carine@w3.org>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, <ylafon@w3.org>

I fixed the typo. 

Gudge

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noah Mendelsohn [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: 11 April 2003 20:51
> To: Martin Gudgin
> Cc: Carine Bournez (E-mail); David Fallside; Nilo Mitra; 
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Marc Hadley; W3C 
> Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org
> 
> I took a look at the comments changes.  Basically OK, but 
> there is at least one spelling error:
> 
> <current>
> Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or 
> descendants of the [document element] element information 
> item but not before or after that element informaton item . 
> There are some restrictions in the processing model with 
> respect to when comment information items can be added and/or 
> removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset).
> </current>
> <minimalChangetoFixSpelling>
> Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or 
> descendants of the [document element] element information 
> item but not before or after that element >information< item 
> . There are some restrictions in the processing model with 
> respect to when comment information items can be added and/or 
> removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset).
> </minimalChangetoFixSpelling>
> 
> <possibleAdditionalChangetoMakeClearer?>
> >Although not explicitly called out in the sections below,< comment
> information items MAY appear >in the Envelope infoset< as 
> children and/or descendants of the [document element] element 
> information item, but not before or after that element 
> >information< item. There are some restrictions in the 
> processing model with respect to when comment information 
> items can be added and/or removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset).
> </possibleAdditionalChangetoMakeClearer?>
> 
> Reasons for proposed additional changes:  (1) makes clear 
> that lack of discussion below is intentional (2) make clear 
> that we do consider these 
> part of the Envelope infoset and thus subject to 
> transmission.   I think 
> that's the only coherent interpretation anyway, but someone 
> might be tempted to look at the sort of oblique introduction 
> of comments at the top of the chapter and say:  "well, if 
> they really mattered, they would have been called out 
> properly."  My proposal to make it an explicit note failed, 
> so I'm wondering if this helps a bit.
> 
> Honestly, I'm not pushing either of these changes hard.  If 
> all we want to do is fix the spelling, or to adopt just the 
> first of the additional changes, I'm fine with that.  Thanks.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
> 04/11/2003 09:35 AM
> 
>  
>         To:     "Jean-Jacques Moreau" 
> <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
>         cc:     "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" 
> <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Marc Hadley" 
> <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" 
> <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, Noah 
> Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM@Lotus, "W3C Public Archive" 
> <www-archive@w3.org>, <ylafon@w3.org>, David Fallside/Santa 
> Teresa/IBM@IBMUS, "Carine Bournez \(E-mail\)" <carine@w3.org>
>         Subject:        RE: SOAP 1.2 PR Documents
> 
> 
> Yes, I added a paragraph to the start of Section 5[1] and 
> removed the entry from Section 1[2]
> 
> Gudge
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/04/11/soap12-part1.html#soapenv
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/04/11/soap12-part1.html#notation
> 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> > Sent: 11 April 2003 14:26
> > To: Martin Gudgin
> > Cc: Jean-Jacques Moreau; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc Hadley; Nilo 
> > Mitra; Noah Mendelson; W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David 
> > Fallside; Carine Bournez (E-mail)
> > 
> > The AI list also mentions issue 355:
> > > 2003/04/09: Editors
> > >     Incorporate 'proper' of Issue 355 (not fully implemented
> > > previously)
> > 
> > So did you do both of 421 and 422?
> > 
> > JJ.
> > 
> > Martin Gudgin wrote:
> > 
> > > I think the only issue resolutions were 421 and 422 (
> > Comments and the
> > > redundant namespace entry in the table in Part 1 ).
> > > 
> > > I'm sorting out the TOC now, Yves is on holiday
> > > 
> > > Gudge
> > > 
> > > 
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: Jean-Jacques Moreau 
> [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> > >>Sent: 11 April 2003 14:22
> > >>To: Martin Gudgin
> > >>Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah
> > Mendelson;
> > >>W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David Fallside; Carine Bournez
> > >>(E-mail)
> > >>
> > >>Ah... I was planning on spending some time this afternoon
> > incoporating
> > >>issue resolutions. Did you also do any of that?
> > >>
> > >>Apart from this (and cleaning up the TOC! -but Yves is good
> > at doing
> > >>this!-), I don't see anything else that needs doing.
> > >>
> > >>Thanks for creating the snapshots,
> > >>
> > >>JJ.
> > >>
> > >>PS. I'll on IRC shortly to speed up communication.
> > >>
> > >>Martin Gudgin wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>As you may have seen from mail from me on the WG list, the spec 
> > >>>documents have been updated for PR. I've made the agreed 
> changes, 
> > >>>removed diff markup and removed change logs. I've generated
> > >>
> > >>snap shots
> > >>
> > >>>at each stage of the process.
> > >>>
> > >>>I think all that needs doing now is the following:
> > >>>
> > >>>1.          Update namespace URIs
> > >>>2.          Update status/boilerplate for PR
> > >>>
> > >>>Does anyone know of anything else that needs doing? 
> > >>>
> > >>>I'm happy to do #1 for all three parts + schemas docs, I
> > >>
> > >>just need to
> > >>
> > >>>know what URIs we're going to use.
> > >>>
> > >>>I'm hoping Yves/Carine can do #2
> > >>>
> > >>>Regards
> > >>>
> > >>>Gudge
> > >>
> > >>
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Saturday, 12 April 2003 16:03:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:29 GMT