W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2003

RE: SOAP 1.2 PR Documents

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 15:50:55 -0400
To: mgudgin@microsoft.com
Cc: "Carine Bournez \(E-mail\)" <carine@w3.org>, fallside@us.ibm.com, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, ylafon@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFCC8E76DA.31AB1C96-ON85256D05.006D0C91@lotus.com>

I took a look at the comments changes.  Basically OK, but there is at 
least one spelling error:

<current>
Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or descendants of the 
[document element] element information item but not before or after that 
element informaton item . There are some restrictions in the processing 
model with respect to when comment information items can be added and/or 
removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset).
</current>
<minimalChangetoFixSpelling>
Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or descendants of the 
[document element] element information item but not before or after that 
element >information< item . There are some restrictions in the processing 
model with respect to when comment information items can be added and/or 
removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset).
</minimalChangetoFixSpelling>

<possibleAdditionalChangetoMakeClearer?>
>Although not explicitly called out in the sections below,< comment 
information items MAY appear >in the Envelope infoset< as children and/or 
descendants of the [document element] element information item, but not 
before or after that element >information< item. There are some 
restrictions in the processing model with respect to when comment 
information items can be added and/or removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed 
Infoset).
</possibleAdditionalChangetoMakeClearer?>

Reasons for proposed additional changes:  (1) makes clear that lack of 
discussion below is intentional (2) make clear that we do consider these 
part of the Envelope infoset and thus subject to transmission.   I think 
that's the only coherent interpretation anyway, but someone might be 
tempted to look at the sort of oblique introduction of comments at the top 
of the chapter and say:  "well, if they really mattered, they would have 
been called out properly."  My proposal to make it an explicit note 
failed, so I'm wondering if this helps a bit.

Honestly, I'm not pushing either of these changes hard.  If all we want to 
do is fix the spelling, or to adopt just the first of the additional 
changes, I'm fine with that.  Thanks.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------







"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
04/11/2003 09:35 AM

 
        To:     "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
        cc:     "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Marc Hadley" 
<marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, Noah 
Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM@Lotus, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, 
<ylafon@w3.org>, David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS, "Carine Bournez 
\(E-mail\)" <carine@w3.org>
        Subject:        RE: SOAP 1.2 PR Documents


Yes, I added a paragraph to the start of Section 5[1] and removed the
entry from Section 1[2]

Gudge

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/04/11/soap12-part1.html#soapenv
[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/04/11/soap12-part1.html#notation

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
> Sent: 11 April 2003 14:26
> To: Martin Gudgin
> Cc: Jean-Jacques Moreau; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc Hadley; 
> Nilo Mitra; Noah Mendelson; W3C Public Archive; 
> ylafon@w3.org; David Fallside; Carine Bournez (E-mail)
> 
> The AI list also mentions issue 355:
> > 2003/04/09: Editors
> >     Incorporate 'proper' of Issue 355 (not fully implemented 
> > previously)
> 
> So did you do both of 421 and 422?
> 
> JJ.
> 
> Martin Gudgin wrote:
> 
> > I think the only issue resolutions were 421 and 422 ( 
> Comments and the 
> > redundant namespace entry in the table in Part 1 ).
> > 
> > I'm sorting out the TOC now, Yves is on holiday
> > 
> > Gudge
> > 
> > 
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> >>Sent: 11 April 2003 14:22
> >>To: Martin Gudgin
> >>Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah 
> Mendelson; 
> >>W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David Fallside; Carine Bournez 
> >>(E-mail)
> >>
> >>Ah... I was planning on spending some time this afternoon 
> incoporating 
> >>issue resolutions. Did you also do any of that?
> >>
> >>Apart from this (and cleaning up the TOC! -but Yves is good 
> at doing 
> >>this!-), I don't see anything else that needs doing.
> >>
> >>Thanks for creating the snapshots,
> >>
> >>JJ.
> >>
> >>PS. I'll on IRC shortly to speed up communication.
> >>
> >>Martin Gudgin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>As you may have seen from mail from me on the WG list, the spec 
> >>>documents have been updated for PR. I've made the agreed changes, 
> >>>removed diff markup and removed change logs. I've generated
> >>
> >>snap shots
> >>
> >>>at each stage of the process.
> >>>
> >>>I think all that needs doing now is the following:
> >>>
> >>>1.          Update namespace URIs
> >>>2.          Update status/boilerplate for PR
> >>>
> >>>Does anyone know of anything else that needs doing? 
> >>>
> >>>I'm happy to do #1 for all three parts + schemas docs, I
> >>
> >>just need to
> >>
> >>>know what URIs we're going to use.
> >>>
> >>>I'm hoping Yves/Carine can do #2
> >>>
> >>>Regards
> >>>
> >>>Gudge
> >>
> >>
> > 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 11 April 2003 15:58:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:29 GMT