W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 10:50:28 -0400
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Cc: henrikn@microsoft.com, marc.hadley@sun.com, moreau@crf.canon.fr, www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF626E7F71.467A2B26-ON85256C3A.0051F679@lotus.com>

Gudge writes:

>> I added text to bullet 1 under 3.1.1 that says
>> 
>> 'In such cases the element information item represents
>> both a graph edge and a graph node'
Good, thank you.

>> I think this covers the fourth entry for 353

But the comment was specifically about the first
sentence, which still says: "Each graph edge is encoded
as an element information item and each element
information item represents a graph edge.", which
borderline contradicts your change to the bullet. I
agree with the commentator that the first sentence
should probably change too, but if you feel not, then my
response to him should indicate that we have rejected
the specifics of his suggestion, but made another
change.  Since the Edtodo list implied we'd accepted
the suggestion, I wanted to doublecheck.

>> 
>> You are correct that our resolution regarding
>> inbound/outbound etc for edges has covered the third
>> entry for 353
Good, thank you.

>> I've been setting issues to 'closed' once I've sent the
>> resolution text.
OK, will probably not be until Monday or Tues., but I'll do it.  Thanks.

>> 
>> Gudge

Thank  you!

Noah

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 20 September 2002 10:52:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:23 GMT