W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > September 2002

Re: env:faultreason or env:faultReason?

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 09:27:04 +0200
Message-ID: <3D75B5C8.2040506@crf.canon.fr>
To: "Nilo Mitra (EUS)" <Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se>
CC: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, Noah Mendelson <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>


Sounds entirely reasonnable, and adherence to our own conventions.

Done.

Nilo Mitra (EUS) wrote:
> In Part 1 section 5.4.2 [1], shouldn't it be env:faultReason ratherthan 
> env:faultreason?
> Please confirm.
> Thanks
> Nilo
>

Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:27:05 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jean-Jacques Moreau: "Re: Added resolution to issue 320"
Previous message: Jeremy Carroll: "F2F social arrangements (resend)"
In reply to: Nilo Mitra (EUS): "env:faultreason or env:faultReason?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:08:44 GMT