W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Remaining open editorial issues

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 13:09:31 -0700
Message-ID: <92456F6B84D1324C943905BEEAE0278E01FC6442@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>

Ah, OK. I think the whitespace issue is a bit wider than just Body, but
perhaps I can reuse/modify the text Marc put in for 208.

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen 
> Sent: 02 September 2002 21:08
> To: Martin Gudgin; 'W3C Public Archive'; 'Jean-Jacques 
> Moreau'; 'Marc Hadley'; 'Nilo Mitra'; 'Noah Mendelson'
> Subject: RE: Remaining open editorial issues
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry, I meant 208 " Clarify that whitespace IS (potentially) 
> significant in Header and Body blocks" :)
> 
> I will try and get to the editing tonight.
> 
> Henrik
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x208
> 
> >OK, those proposals haven't shown up in my inbox yet :-(
> >
> >If you can do 284 and 320 today that would be great, although
> >tomorrow would be early enough, I know today is a holiday 
> for you guys.
> >
> >210 seems to be about attributes while 262 is about
> >whitespace, so I don't think it's a dupe.
> 
Received on Monday, 2 September 2002 16:10:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:22 GMT