- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:37:10 -0700
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
OK, those proposals haven't shown up in my inbox yet :-( If you can do 284 and 320 today that would be great, although tomorrow would be early enough, I know today is a holiday for you guys. 210 seems to be about attributes while 262 is about whitespace, so I don't think it's a dupe. Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > Sent: 02 September 2002 20:06 > To: Martin Gudgin; W3C Public Archive; Jean-Jacques Moreau; > Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah Mendelson > Subject: RE: Remaining open editorial issues > > > > I just sent out proposals for 261 and 264 and can incorporate > resolutions for 284 and 320 today. 262 seems to be a dupe of 210, no? > > Henrik > > >The following editorial issues still need to be resolved by us and > >incorporated into the spec. > > > >261, 262 and 264 > > > >Editorial issue 284 is closed but the resolution still needs to be > >incorporated into the spec. Issue 320 is closed but the resolution > >still needs to be incorporated into the spec. > > > >I know how I want to resolve 262, and I think I will > incorporate that > >resolution into the proposal I am making regarding Comments, > prefixes, > >namespace attributes and other infosetisms. I believe Henrik will be > >making proposals for closing Issues 261 and 264. > > > >Can someone step up to incorporate the resolutions for 284 and 320? >
Received on Monday, 2 September 2002 15:37:43 UTC