W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > December 2002

RE: Editorial comments for Part 1, section 1-3

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:54:31 -0800
Message-ID: <68B95AA1648D1840AB0083CC63E57AD60A1B3DA8@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <www-archive@w3.org>

>OK, so ignoring for the moment any logistical issues over
>depending on a 
>CR-level namespaces draft, I think that where we say qualified name we 
>often mean expanded name.  Do you agree?  

Yup (and logistic issues may indeed be hard to ignore)

>I think this should
>be checked 
>with the WG if we decide to make any changes, as I think it's 
>a bit beyond 
>editorial.  Thanks.

While it does seem editorial in nature, I agree that such things from
now go on the issues list for WG review. In general, I think this
applies to pretty much any change given where we are.

Thank you,

Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 22:55:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:42:17 UTC