RE: Editorial comments for Part 1, section 1-3

Do you want to send a note to WG or should I.  I would have to do a bit of 
research as to exactly what our current text says, so if you happen to 
know you might just dash off a note.  If I don't see you do it within the 
next couple of days, I'll try and get to it.  Thanks.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------







"Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
12/18/02 10:54 PM

 
        To:     <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
        cc:     "Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, "Nilo Mitra" 
<EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "Marc 
Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, 
"Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <www-archive@w3.org>
        Subject:        RE: Editorial comments for Part 1, section 1-3
Categories: 
 





>OK, so ignoring for the moment any logistical issues over
>depending on a 
>CR-level namespaces draft, I think that where we say qualified name we 
>often mean expanded name.  Do you agree? 

Yup (and logistic issues may indeed be hard to ignore)

>I think this should
>be checked 
>with the WG if we decide to make any changes, as I think it's 
>a bit beyond 
>editorial.  Thanks.

While it does seem editorial in nature, I agree that such things from
now go on the issues list for WG review. In general, I think this
applies to pretty much any change given where we are.

Thank you,

Henrik