W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Some editorial tweaks

From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 13:46:42 -0500
Cc: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Message-Id: <BB044472-07B8-11D7-8C5B-0003937568DC@sun.com>

Aren't we going to remove the change log as part of removing the diff 
markup ?

Marc.

On Wednesday, Dec 4, 2002, at 13:30 US/Eastern, Martin Gudgin wrote:

> We should definitely put them in the change log.
>
> I take it you meant to say 'ask the WG for license to fix' rather than
> 'ask the WG to fix'
>
> Gudge
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
>> Sent: 04 December 2002 10:25
>> To: Martin Gudgin; W3C Public Archive; Jean-Jacques Moreau;
>> Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah Mendelson
>> Subject: RE: Some editorial tweaks
>>
>>
>>
>> These seem find to me. What I would suggest is that we as
>> part of the plan for the next week ask the WG to fix
>> editorial inconsistencies given the changes that has been
>> made to the spec during last call as long as we document them
>> in a change log.
>>
>> Does this make sense?
>>
>> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
>> mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
>>
>>> I read through Part 1 last night and noted that there are
>>> several things that need editorial attention/clarification.
>>> Here is a list of the things I noted, in the order they appear
>>> in the spec. BTW - I'm happy to make all these changes
>>> sometime before close of business Monday.
>>
>
>
--
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 13:46:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:24 GMT