RE: Some editorial tweaks

We should definitely put them in the change log.

I take it you meant to say 'ask the WG for license to fix' rather than
'ask the WG to fix'

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen 
> Sent: 04 December 2002 10:25
> To: Martin Gudgin; W3C Public Archive; Jean-Jacques Moreau; 
> Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah Mendelson
> Subject: RE: Some editorial tweaks
> 
> 
> 
> These seem find to me. What I would suggest is that we as 
> part of the plan for the next week ask the WG to fix 
> editorial inconsistencies given the changes that has been 
> made to the spec during last call as long as we document them 
> in a change log.
> 
> Does this make sense?
> 
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
> mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
> 
> >I read through Part 1 last night and noted that there are
> >several things that need editorial attention/clarification. 
> >Here is a list of the things I noted, in the order they appear 
> >in the spec. BTW - I'm happy to make all these changes 
> >sometime before close of business Monday.
>