W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2002

RE: Issues 261, 262, 264 and 265 misassigned to Part 0?

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:22:59 -0700
Message-ID: <92456F6B84D1324C943905BEEAE0278E0145CD80@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Nilo Mitra (EUS)" <Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se>, "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Marc Hadley " <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Noah Mendelson [SMTP:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com]Jean-Jacques Moreau " <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: "W3C Public Archive " <www-archive@w3.org>
issue 263 has been handled and closed. Issues 261, 262, 264 and 265 have
not. I have added them to the edtodo
 
Gudge

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Nilo Mitra (EUS) [mailto:Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se] 
	Sent: 28 August 2002 01:11
	To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; 'Marc Hadley '; Nilo Mitra (EUS);
'Noah Mendelson [SMTP:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com]Jean-Jacques Moreau ';
Martin Gudgin
	Cc: 'W3C Public Archive '
	Subject: Issues 261, 262, 264 and 265 misassigned to Part 0?
	
	

	Gentlemen: 
	Ploughing through the issues list, I notice that Issues #261,
262, 263 (closed), 264 and 265 have their "Title" reference Part 0.
However the text of the issues are from Part 1.

	I was wondering if you have looked at these from the POV of Part
1, or has the title misled you into skipping these? 

	I notice that Issue 263 was also similarly mislabelled in the
title, but it was handled and closed in the F2F as a main specification
(Part 1) change. So perhaps you have considered the others as well.

	Thanks 
	Nilo 
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 14:23:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:22 GMT