RE: Issues 261, 262, 264 and 265 misassigned to Part 0?

issue 263 has been handled and closed. Issues 261, 262, 264 and 265 have
not. I have added them to the edtodo
 
Gudge

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Nilo Mitra (EUS) [mailto:Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se] 
	Sent: 28 August 2002 01:11
	To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; 'Marc Hadley '; Nilo Mitra (EUS);
'Noah Mendelson [SMTP:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com]Jean-Jacques Moreau ';
Martin Gudgin
	Cc: 'W3C Public Archive '
	Subject: Issues 261, 262, 264 and 265 misassigned to Part 0?
	
	

	Gentlemen: 
	Ploughing through the issues list, I notice that Issues #261,
262, 263 (closed), 264 and 265 have their "Title" reference Part 0.
However the text of the issues are from Part 1.

	I was wondering if you have looked at these from the POV of Part
1, or has the title misled you into skipping these? 

	I notice that Issue 263 was also similarly mislabelled in the
title, but it was handled and closed in the F2F as a main specification
(Part 1) change. So perhaps you have considered the others as well.

	Thanks 
	Nilo