W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2002

RE: Range of URI+fragment dereference function (new issue?)

From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:45:55 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F04A07004@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org

Hi Dan,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org]
> Sent: 27 August 2002 21:53
> To: Stuart Williams
> Cc: www-archive@w3.org; Dan Connolly
> Subject: RE: Range of URI+fragment dereference function (new issue?)
> 
> 
> [sorry for the delay in responding. not copied
> to www-tag, which has probably moved on.]

No problem, and yes I think things have indeed moved on.

> On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 10:06, Williams, Stuart wrote:
> > Dan,
> > 
> > > If the question is
> > > 	What do URI references refer to?
> > > the answer is:
> > > 	They're abbreviations for URIs,
> > > 	which refer to resources.
> > 
> > What URI is the URI reference http://example.com#myCar an abbreviation
of?
> 
> http://example.com#myCar
> 
> (recall that at this point in the conversation, I was using
> URI to include things with #'s in them)

Ok... in that world the terms 'URI' and 'URI reference' would appear to be
synonyms... but I don't think we need to burn any time agreeing or
disagreeing on that.

> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> 

Thanks,

Stuart
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 05:46:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:22 GMT