RE: Issue 248

Thanks for your suggestion. I was intending to do it last, as well...and then plead memory loss.
Nilo

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Nilo Mitra (EUS); W3C Public Archive; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Marc Hadley; Noah Mendelson; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Subject: RE: Issue 248


I'd make it VERY low priority if I were you ( like I'd do it after absolutely everything else :-) )
 
Gudge

-----Original Message-----
From: Nilo Mitra (EUS) [mailto:Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se] 
Sent: 21 August 2002 16:57
To: Martin Gudgin; W3C Public Archive; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra (EUS); Noah Mendelson; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Subject: RE: Issue 248



No real objection, as such, just a lot of work I'd rather not do. But I'll get around to it 
...sigh! 
Nilo 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Martin Gudgin [ mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com <mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com> ] 
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:24 PM 
To: W3C Public Archive; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; 
Noah Mendelson; Martin Gudgin; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen 
Subject: Issue 248 


Issue 248[1] is marked editorial. Nilo, do you have any objection to 
making the Primer use the same convention as the rest of the spec ( 
description of examples at the top rather than the bottom ) 

Thanks 

Gudge 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x248 <http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x248>