W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2002

Re: getting daml:imports right is easy? [was: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05]

From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:47:04 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200204242347.g3ONl4409554@pantheon-po03.its.yale.edu>
To: connolly@w3.org
CC: drew.mcdermott@yale.edu, www-archive@w3.org, danbri@w3.org


An idle question: Why is just the three of us plus the archive that
are having this discussion?  Have I joined some sort of inner W3C
cabal?  It seems as though www-rdf-logic should be listening in.

                                             -- Drew

Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 19:47:12 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mike Dean: "Re: LANG: compliance levels"
Previous message: Drew McDermott: "Re: getting daml:imports right is easy? [was: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05]"
In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: getting daml:imports right is easy? [was: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05]"
Next in thread: Dan Connolly: "Re: getting daml:imports right is easy? [was: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05]"
Reply: Dan Connolly: "Re: getting daml:imports right is easy? [was: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05]"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:17 GMT