> [...] exploring the use of rdfs:range instead of 'values' > as the property is the harder bit. Just noodling on the relationship between "values" and "range"... We have:- :bottom :values "<length> | <percentage> | auto | inherit" . which is *like*:- :bottom :value v:length, v:percentage, v:auto, v:inherit . but is more accurately modelled as:- :bottom rdfs:range :Bottom . :Bottom daml:unionOf (u:length u:percentage [ daml:oneOf (v:auto v:inherit) ]) . This means that the range of "values" in my original result is an alternate plain text representation of the range of the CSS properties. { ?x :values ?y } log:implies { ?x rdfs:range ?z . ?z rdfs:label ?y } . or, more like:- { ?x :values ?y } log:implies { ?x rdfs:range ?z . ?z :altRepr ?y } . Which is not at all useful, unless someone really wants to follow up and start an RDF version of CSS. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .Received on Saturday, 10 November 2001 17:30:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:08:29 GMT