- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 09:30:50 +0200
- To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- CC: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>, www-archive@w3.org
I think I agree with Hugo on this one. Jean-Jacques. Hugo Haas wrote: > * Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com> [2001-08-30 12:56-0700] > > Are you saying that it is not clear from the text that the type is > > boolean? I would tend to say that we should refer to the schema rather > > than saying what type it is in the text - it seems more brittle to have > > the definition in multiple places. > > Indeed, the text says that the value of the root attribute can be > either "true" of "false". Without saying that it's a boolean as > defined by schema, nothing in the text says that it can also be "1" or > "0". > > I have no problem with adding a link to the schema too, but I think > it's underspecified right now. > > The mustUnderstand attribute is clearly identified as a boolean[1]: > > The mustUnderstand attribute information item has the following Infoset > properties: > * A local name of mustUnderstand; > * A namespace name of http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-envelope; > * A specified property with a value of true. > > The type of the mustUnderstand attribute information item is boolean in > the namespace http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema. Omitting this > attribute information item is defined as being semantically equivalent > to including it with a value of "false". > > I think that the root attribute should get the same treatment. :-) > > 1. http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/08/29/soap12-part1.html#soapmu > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092
Received on Friday, 31 August 2001 03:32:11 UTC