W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-annotation@w3.org > July to December 2002

Re: server response from annotation post

From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 09:15:45 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: rainking@rice.edu, www-annotation@w3.org

We are currently discussing about returning info about only the created 
URI's (annotation and sometimes body), which is the new information. The 
client knows the rest and if not, it can be always queried by using the 
URI's. Not sure if returning everything would be more optimized.


At 03:21 PM 8/10/2002 -0500, rainking@rice.edu wrote:

>Does anyone know why the server response to POSTing an annotation (as 
>by the protocols) provides only a subset of the RDF describing the annotation
>and not the entire set?  I believe it would be useful to have complete
>information in the response, thus eliminating the need for a second HTTP
>transmission to retrieve the full RDF info.
>While in theory the application posting the annotation can infer the rest 
>of the
>information, confirmation would be useful.
>Any thoughts?
Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 09:29:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:55 UTC