Re: seeAlso etc.

At 13:04 06/06/02 +0000, Jim Ley wrote:

>Matthew wrote:
>At 17:01 05/06/02 +0000, Jim Ley wrote:
> >>Are any Annotation Types other than comment currently implemented? It
> >>seems to me everything is a Comment.
> >
> >Really? When I was starting on Annozilla, it looked to me as though
> >everything were an Annotation, but some were also other types, eg
>Comments.
>
>All the annotations have rdf:type of a:Annotation however they also have
>a property a:annotationType of
>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotationType#Comment
>
>Since looking in more detail, I've also found an
>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotationType#Example
>although the actual annotations don't appear to be any different from the
>normal comments, and certainly aren't Examples and a single one of
>Question - they seem to share a addr:name/addr:firstName being identical
>aswell, so it could be from a different UA?

Annozilla can do different annotation types.

>On that might it be nice if we could trace which client made an
>attribution - at the moment I only send identifying in the http header,
>it might be nice if we included it withing the attribution itself.

I agree this would be useful, if only for identifying compatibility problems.

Matthew