W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-annotation@w3.org > January to June 2002

RE: Using XPointer with HTML

From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 12:14:54 +0300
Message-ID: <E657D8576967CF448D6AF22CB42DD26908BED3@ermhs.Athens.BrokerSystems.gr>
To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
Cc: <www-annotation@w3.org>, <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>

I believe you are talking about the meta element[1] when used with the
http-equiv attribute.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/global.html#meta-data

Kindest regards,


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Ley [mailto:jim@jibbering.com] 
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 11:58 AM
> To: www-annotation@w3.org; HTML WG
> Subject: Re: Using XPointer with HTML
> > The actual question we were discussing was: can an XHTML 1.1 be
> delivered as
> > text/html? The answer is apparently yes.
> >
> > Indeed, to make it WAI compliant the document above should 
> be delivered
> with
> > a content-language header, or there should be a <meta> to 
> that effect
> added.
> Can you clarify this META?

Says for HTML 4.0:

| An element inherits language code information according to the
| order of precedence (highest to lowest):

|The lang attribute set for the element itself.
|The closest parent element that has the lang attribute set (i.e., the
|attribute is inherited).
|The HTTP "Content-Language" header (which may be configured in a
|server). For example: Content-Language: en-cockney
|User agent default values and user preferences.

No mention of META, has something changed for XHTML?

Received on Friday, 19 April 2002 05:15:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:55 UTC