- From: Barstow Art (NMP/Boston) <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 17:16:19 -0500
- To: "'ext Marja-Riitta Koivunen'" <marja@w3.org>, "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>, "'ext Matthew Wilson'" <matthew@mjwilson.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: <www-annotation@w3.org>
> From: ext Marja-Riitta Koivunen [mailto:marja@w3.org] > The thread schema was not supposed to affect old clients, I > did test with > old Amaya. But obviously that was not enough. We should have > asked someone > else to test too. I have two names now on my list that we can > ask next time. Marja - you should/could test schema or protocol changes with the Annotea JavaScript interfaces: [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/Bookmarklet/Annotea-JavaScript.html > Meanwhile we try see what is wrong and correct it as soon as possible. Hmmm. The Annotea Servlet? Jim - does your Annotea implementation use an Annotea Servlet like [1] does or does it go directly to an Annotea Server? Matthew - at one point EricP was talking about modifying the Annotea server (protocol?) so that Annozilla could bypass the Annotea Servlet and go directly to the server. I don't know the status of that work. I believe the issue was that Mozilla was expecting a different MIME media type for the RDF/XML returned from the server. Even if this current problem is not related to the Annotea Servlet perhaps you and EricP can determine a way to eliminate the servlet from the pipeline. Art ---
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2002 17:17:42 UTC