- From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 16:38:00 -0500
- To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>, <www-annotation@w3.org>
The thread schema was not supposed to affect old clients, I did test with old Amaya. But obviously that was not enough. We should have asked someone else to test too. I have two names now on my list that we can ask next time. Meanwhile we try see what is wrong and correct it as soon as possible. Marja At 08:27 PM 1/9/2002 +0000, Jim Ley wrote: >"Matthew Wilson" <matthew@mjwilson.demon.co.uk> > > At 18:41 19/12/01 +0100, Jose Kahan wrote: > > > At the moment Annozilla (my Mozilla client) is confused by the RDF it's > > getting back from requesting a list of annotations for a page, >presumably > > because of the changes to the schema. > >It's killed my implementation too, was it really a good idea to implement >the new scema and destroy 75% of the implementations with little warning? >Especially the only implementations supported in real world browsers (no >disrespect to Amaya, but it's lack of scripting unfortunately limits its >usefulness in browsing, due to clueless web authors.) > >(will look at fixing mine.) > >Matthew - haven't you got RDF parsers available in Mozilla, can't you use >them to sort it out, just work on the triples? - also >http://www.e-media.co.uk/earl/rdftoys.html and >http://www.e-media.co.uk/earl/rdfquery2.html has RDF parsing/querying in >javascript if you've not got parsers available. > >Jim.
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2002 16:39:24 UTC