Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Philip TAYLOR wrote: >>> And yet we do not require knowing how to read in order to read (e.g. >>> voice synthesizers). Why the double-standard? >> >> Boris, do you not perceive any difference between >> /knowing/ how to read and /being physically capable/ >> of reading (where "reading" is defined as mentally >> assigning sounds and semantics to a visually-perceived >> string of characters) ? > Was there a point to this question, if I might ask? There was : your message suggested (quite explicitly, if I may say so) that those who are dependent on voice synthesisers do not know how to read; I found this somewhat offensive, and tried to suggest that those who so dependent are physically incapable of reading (as I chose to define it) rather than not "knowing how to read". Philip TAYLORReceived on Sunday, 24 August 2008 16:58:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:48:43 GMT