Philip TAYLOR wrote: > I am afraid that the current editor's draft specification > bends over backwards so far to permit ill-formed documents > to be rendered that any hopes that he will treat the <img> > element strictly whilst treating all other aspects leniently > are destined to be dashed ... I think so too, though I think that it's not just the editor would would insist on lenient treatment of HTML, but also at the very least representatives of existing HTML UAs. -BorisReceived on Sunday, 24 August 2008 16:52:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:32:08 GMT