W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > April 2008

Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking

From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:41:35 +0100
Message-ID: <55687cf80804140941g2d6f41ddp1d7ed82503826d1a@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org

Hi Henri,

"stamp of approval" was tongue in cheek.

I am not saying that the conformance checker needs to flag these
issues, I am only pointing out the limitations of conformance checkers
to provide  a measure of HTML5 "conformance" other than syntactic.

So the holy grail of conformance (to a checker) may well not be real
conformance to the requirements in HTML5.

PS; think your idea about providing alt checking fetaure in
va,idator.nu is would be a useful addition.


On 14/04/2008, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2008, at 17:43, Steven Faulkner wrote:
> > So while the web may one day contain many documents that get the HTML5
> > conformance checker "stamp of approval" It will actually be littered
> > with non conforming HTML5 documents..
> >
> Assuming that a conformance checker issue stamps of approval emerges.
> However, regardless alt, there are many other reasons why passing
> machine-checkable conformance criteria does not imply that the
> non-machine-checkable conformance criteria was passed as well.
> For example, HTML 5 seeks to make layout tables non-conforming, which I
> think it is an exercise in futility. Anyway, it isn't machine-checkable.
> (WCAG 2.0 allows layout tables and ARIA even caters to them, by the way.
> Both pragmatic choices.)
> --
> Henri Sivonen
> hsivonen@iki.fi
> http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Web Accessibility Toolbar -
Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 16:42:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:51:35 UTC