W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > April 2008

process Re: omitting alt: closing an open ...

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:51:30 +0200
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Al Gilman" <alfred.s.gilman@ieee.org>, "Steve Faulkner" <sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, wai-xtech@w3.org, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t9geb4w9wxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:06:51 +0200, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:

> It might be nice if the tracker had more states
> than raised/open/closed, but meanwhile, Ian and
> I have chatted about this, and the technical
> constraints being what they are, he has offered
> to let us know that he's caught up on email on
> a an issue by marking them 'closed', and I agreed
> that's useful.

Which seems a priori sensible. Maybe we could imprve on it by raising an  
action on the editor to consider each issue, so he can close that when he  
considers that he has done so, as a trigger to review it and see if the  
working group agrees?

I am sure that there are better ideaas than this, or better versions of  
this idea. But it seems to me an improvement on the current process.  
(Flames/thoughts/constructive criticism/constructive criticism welcome :) )



Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals   Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 15:52:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:51:35 UTC