W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > December 2007

Re: activedescendant vs activedescendent

From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 18:39:22 +0000
To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>, dev-accessibility@lists.mozilla.org
Cc: wai-xtech@w3.org
Message-Id: <20071209183222.M46411@hicom.net>

aloha, alexander!

since the gecko implementation is based on the syntax of the ARIA 
documents, and the ARIA documents use a terminal "e":


activedesencdent with a terminal e is correct -- marco and/or aaron -- 
is anyone tasked with taking the gecko implementation and checking it 
for consistency with the syntax used in the ARIA specifications?  (for 
example, labeledby versus labelledby -- a common error)

when in doubt implementing use the syntax in the specification -- that's
what it's there for -- to define the standard to be implemented

ACCOUNTABILITY, n. The mother of caution.
                 -- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
         Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net
      Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/
UBATS-United Advocates for Talking Signs: http://ubats.org

---------- Original Message -----------
From: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
To: dev-accessibility@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 09:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Subject: activedescendant vs activedescendent

> ARIA has state activedescendEnt (http://www.w3.org/TR/aria-state/
> #activedescendent) but in Gecko we use activedescendAnt (http://
> lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/accessible/src/base/
> nsARIAPropertyList.h#41). Which of these is correct?
> Alexander.
------- End of Original Message -------
Received on Sunday, 9 December 2007 18:39:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:51:34 UTC