Al Gilman wrote: > > At 03:14 PM 2001-08-03 , gregory j. rosmaita wrote: > >CMN: I think the "pictures of words" bit should go back to the WCAG group. > > > >GJR: which part? that pictures of words ain't words? > > > ><span lang="franglais"> ceci n'est pas une pipe, non? </span> > > > >no, it's not a pipe -- it's a question... > > > > a) everything that generates debate in XTECH should go back to the affected > groups -- here at least GL and UA -- who may confirm or deny acquiescence in > the proposal of the intergroup caucus. But perhaps after giving XTECH some > time to settle on a provisional resolution of the question. Cf. conference > committee in a bicameral legislature such as in the U.S. Let me add that I'd like to see a concrete proposal before I would want to take any UAWG time reconsidering our definitions. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Cell: +1 917 450-8783Received on Friday, 3 August 2001 16:16:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2007 14:26:19 GMT