Re: Translations reply -- Re: [wbs] response to 'EOWG Weekly Survey - 09 November 2018'

Excellent Shawn. Thank you for the explanations. No further consideration
needed.  :)


Brent A. Bakken
Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
Psychometrics & Testing Services
*Pearson*

512 202 1087
brent.bakken@pearson.com






On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 2:41 PM Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote:

> Brent,
>
> Thanks for the review and input. A few thoughts are below.
>
> > - I still have a small worry that the "skip to content link will be lost
> if
> > is is aligned *with* the languages. I am not sure what is a better
> > solution. Having on the left would seem awkward. Happy to leave this up
> to
> > the editors/designers.
>
> Agree having it on the left would not be best.
>
> I think the "Skip to Content" will mostly be used by:
> * screen readers users -- who should hear it first, before the languages
> * visual non-mouse users -- who will often get it from the first tab
>
> If I'm not missing some important &/or common user scenarios, then I think
> it's OK because it is  the first thing that people who need it will get
> (even if they don't see it visually otherwise).
>
> > - Is the change log going to be automated in some way. I cannot imagine
> us
> > being able to keep up with all the changes while we wait on all of the
> > translations being updated. What is the plan for managing all of the
> > translation changes when a resources changes? This process is not exactly
> > clear in the Updates to English Version section, but I do understand that
> > this is still being drafted/determined.
>
> Yup, still being determined. I will definitely let you and others know
> when it is more fleshed out and ready for more input.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Shawn
>
>