- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:14:25 -0500
- To: melody.yy.ma@gmail.com
- Cc: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Hi Melody, Please see some comments below. On 8/19/2015 12:54 AM, Melody Ma via WBS Mailer wrote: > The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'EOWG Weekly > Survey - 14 August 2015' (Education and Outreach Working Group) for Melody > Ma. > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Tips - Combining writing tips >> ---- >> **Note that action on this item is due by Wednesday 19 August at the very >> latest** >> For this issue, we are using the wiki page: Writing Tips combined. Please >> review background and add your comments in the Fresh Perspectives >> section. If you are not comfortable with writing to the wiki, post your >> comments here or to the EOWG mailing list. >> > > * ( ) I reviewed the issue and put my comments in the wiki. > * (x) I reviewed the issue and put my comments below or in email to the > EOWG list > * ( ) I reviewed the issue and have no comments to add > * ( ) I'm not going to be able to get to this, and I will pass on > commenting on it. > > One tip is sufficient at this level. The two separate tips seem similar > enough that expanding them to two or more does not add additional value. I added your comment to the wiki. > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Tips - Changes for review >> ---- >> We made the following changes to the Tips pages last week: >> >> * Writing Tips - Page Titles tip - changed example (GitHub #132) >> >> * Writing Tips - Headings example - changed styling of headings and >> presentation of example (GitHub 83ffe8b) >> >> * Writing Tips - Clear instructions tip - simplified example (GitHub >> c6b006e) >> >> * Designing Tips - Tip on instructions - slight changes to title and >> content (GitHub 36cd624) >> >> To comment on any of the changes, please use the GitHub links above (or >> comment in this survey, or raise a new issue in GitHub). >> > > * ( ) I'm OK with these changes. > * ( ) I put comments in GitHub. > * (x) I put comments below. > * ( ) I have not gotten to this yet, and will do it by: [put in the > Comment field the date by which you will get to it] > * ( ) I'm not going to be able to get to this, and I will pass on > commenting on it. > Comments: > 2. Headings should be semantically correct too and not just styles. May be > a dev/design tip more than writing though... Right, we have that in Tips on Developing at <http://w3c.github.io/wai-quick-start/developing.html#use-mark-up-to-convey-meaning-and-structure> :) > > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Tips - Icons >> ---- >> EOWG previously agreed on icons for Writing, Developing, Managing, and >> Advocating. For Designing, we have narrowed it down to 3 options. For >> Evaluating, we have one option. >> To review past discussions, see: >> * Introduce topic of Icons for Tips in 05 June Minutes >> * Explore and discuss draft icons in 12 June Minutes >> * Detail of Icon Issues in GitHubPlease see the agreed upon icons, the >> options, and some of the ideas rejected in the Icon Samples page. >> >> The questions below ask about current options. If you have another strong >> suggestion for designing, please put a link to the image in the comments >> here. >> >> > Comments: > > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Tips - Icons - Designing 1 >> ---- >> Icon of paint brush. >> >> Pros: Simple, clean, works well at all sizes >> >> Cons: Conveys only art/visual design; Does not covey interaction design >> at all, which is a significant part of this page >> > > * [ ] I prefer Designing icon 1 (paint brush) > * [x] I'm OK with Designing icon 1 (paint brush) > * [ ] I have concerns with Designing icon 1 (paint brush) > * [ ] I'm not going to be able to get to this; I will pass on commenting > on it and go with the decision of the Group. > Comments: > A nicer paintbrush would be nice. At this point, I think Kevin has exhausted his searching. If you have a specific suggestion for an image, please share it. Also, do you have comments on 2 and 3 below? Thanks! ~Shawn > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Tips - Icons - Designing 2 >> ---- >> Icon of computer with paint brush. >> >> Pros: Conveys design for a digital platform >> >> Cons: Not as clear at smallest size >> > > * [ ] I prefer Designing icon 2 (computer with paint brush) > * [ ] I'm OK with Designing icon 2 (computer with paint brush) > * [ ] I have concerns with Designing icon 2 (computer with paint brush) > * [ ] I'm not going to be able to get to this; I will pass on commenting > on it and go with the decision of the Group. > Comments: > > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Tips - Icons - Designing 3 >> ---- >> Icon of wireframe. >> >> Pros: Conveys page design >> >> Cons: More complicated, not clear at small sizes >> > > * [ ] I prefer Designing icon 3 (wireframe) > * [ ] I'm OK with Designing icon 3 (wireframe) > * [ ] I have concerns with Designing icon 3 (wireframe) > * [ ] I'm not going to be able to get to this; I will pass on commenting > on it and go with the decision of the Group. > Comments: > > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Tips - Icons - Evaluating >> ---- >> We spent quite a bit of effort exploring icons of Evaluating. Several >> were rejected for specific reasons — e.g., anything related to a >> checkbox was rejected and there was discomfort with a magnifying glass. >> We're left with a bug icon, even though some people were not keen on it >> previously. >> >> Pros: Simple, clean, works well at all sizes; "bug" is common idea for >> programmers, QA, managers, and others (who are primary, although not >> only, audiences of this page) >> >> Cons: Won't be immediately understood by all (some in EOWG thought of it >> as crawling through a website, which is good, too) >> > > * [ ] I really like the bug icon for Evaluating > * [x] I'm OK with the bug icon for Evaluating > * [ ] I have concerns with the bug icon for Evaluating, and have another > strong suggestion of an icon, which is linked in the comments below > * [ ] I'm not going to be able to get to this; I will pass on commenting > on it and go with the decision of the Group. > Comments: > > >> >> These answers were last modified on 19 August 2015 at 05:52:05 U.T.C. >> by Melody Ma >> > Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/EOWG-14Aug2015/ until 2015-08-20. > > Regards, > > The Automatic WBS Mailer >
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2015 14:14:32 UTC