W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-eo-editors@w3.org > October 2005

Re: Feedback and question

From: Wendy Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:48:09 -0400
Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20051013124719.030773b8@localhost>
To: Luke Rogers <lukieben@hotmail.com>
Cc: wai-eo-editors@w3.org, wai@w3.org

Additionally, information about Flash and accessibility is available at:
1. http://www.macromedia.com/resources/accessibility/
2. <http://www.webaim.org/techniques/flash/>
Best,
--w

At 12:23 PM 10/13/2005, Shawn Henry wrote:

>Dear Luke,
>
>Thank you for taking the time to write. If you have any specific feedback 
>-- such as which documents had difficult jargon, which documents you 
>wanted summaries of, and which intra-page links were confusing -- we would 
>very much welcome it.
>
>You might find "Introduction to Web Accessibility" helpful at:
>         http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php
>
>The WAI site does not have specific information about Macromedia Flash and 
>its accessibility levels -- primarily because Flash is not a W3C 
>technology. WAI does host a Web Accessibility Interest Group where such 
>issues of Web accessibility are sometimes discussed. You can search the 
>mailing list archives to see if this topic has been addressed recently, 
>through:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/
>Information on joining the mailing list and posting questions is at:
>   http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG/Overview.html#Uselist
>
>Best regards,
>~ Shawn
>
>Luke Rogers wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>A little bit of feedback on your accessibilty information.
>>
>>Considerring that a large portion of the guidelines promote accessible 
>>language and clear, simple document layouts, i find your site very hard to use.
>>
>>it's not the design or technology used - more the jargoned-language, the 
>>confusing intra-page links and the lack of any clear summeries of 
>>long-winded documents.
>>
>>I came on the site looking for information about Macromedia Flash and 
>>it's accessibility levels - can't find a thing - could you point to that 
>>information please?
>>
>>Many thanks
>>
>>Luke
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2005 16:48:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:18:31 UTC