W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-eo-editors@w3.org > October 2005

Re: Feedback and question

From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:23:43 -0500
Message-ID: <434E8A0F.1070602@w3.org>
To: Luke Rogers <lukieben@hotmail.com>
Cc: wai-eo-editors@w3.org, wai@w3.org

Dear Luke,

Thank you for taking the time to write. If you have any specific feedback -- such as which documents had difficult jargon, which documents you wanted summaries of, and which intra-page links were confusing -- we would very much welcome it.

You might find "Introduction to Web Accessibility" helpful at:
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php

The WAI site does not have specific information about Macromedia Flash and its accessibility levels -- primarily because Flash is not a W3C technology. WAI does host a Web Accessibility Interest Group where such issues of Web accessibility are sometimes discussed. You can search the mailing list archives to see if this topic has been addressed recently, through:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/
Information on joining the mailing list and posting questions is at:
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG/Overview.html#Uselist

Best regards,
~ Shawn

Luke Rogers wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> A little bit of feedback on your accessibilty information.
>  
> Considerring that a large portion of the guidelines promote 
> accessible language and clear, simple document layouts, i find your site 
> very hard to use.
>  
> it's not the design or technology used - more the jargoned-language, the 
> confusing intra-page links and the lack of any clear summeries of 
> long-winded documents.
>  
> I came on the site looking for information about Macromedia Flash and 
> it's accessibility levels - can't find a thing - could you point to that 
> information please?
>  
> Many thanks
>  
> Luke 
>  
>  
>  
>  
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2005 16:23:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:18:31 UTC