W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-eo-editors@w3.org > April 2004

RE: [Business case]: some typing mistakes

From: Shawn Lawton Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:33:27 -0500
To: "'Sylvie Duchateau'" <sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>, <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c42108$16cc01a0$418d7544@SLHenry>

Sylvie,

Thank you for your review and comments on the business case. I will post
a revised version with your changes and other's changes soon.

I made all of the changes that you recommended, and marked them as
"[DONE]" below for the record.

Regards,

~ Shawn


[DONE] 1. In overview, introduction, second paragrap: "There is an
initial cost for  organziations implementing Web accessibility;" typing
mistake in organizations.

[DONE] 2. Several times on the overview page we find the word:
accessibilty. Also  two times in social factors.

[DONE] 3. In technical factors:
In paragraph: "Identifying Technical Factors for a Specific
Organization". Typo  error: first list fourth bullet: "be prepared for
advanced Web 
technologies? provide future-compatibility of you technology?" write
your 
technology.

[DONE] 4. In financial factors:
Bullet: How will the organization's specific Web site issues impact 
on-going costs?
Typing mistake in "content, such as providing captions for the audio in 
multimedia content. Similarly, the type of content and the development
and 
testing environment in
the organziation determines the impact of accessibility on added
(quality 
assurance) testing time." organziation instead of organization.

[DONE] 5. In policy page :
introduction: Legal and policy factors apply differently to specific 
organizations and situations. For example, one organization might be 
required by explicit government
regulations to make their Web sites accessible, while other organization

follows the Web accessibility policies recommended by its trade
association 
and regulations to make their Web sites accessible, while other 
organization follows the Web accessibility policies recommended by its 
trade association and
required by a partner company." Isn't it: "while other organizations 
follow.. their" or "while another organization follows?".

[DONE] 6. In section: "Identifying Legal and Policy Factors for a
Specific 
Organization" bullet: ". @@ think this needs to be a section below & not
a 
question@@ Is it helpful to include the risk of failing to provide 
accessible Web sites?"
action for not complying with requirements for Web accessibility.
Sometimes 
the legal requirements for an organization might not be clear. In such
cases, some  organization determine that it is in their best interest
(financially 
and otherwise) to make their sites accessible, rather than risk legal 
action. correct: some organizations determine.

[DONE] 7. In section "industry and Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)"
it  seems 
that a word is missing in sentence in second paragraph: "Many
corporations 
and NGOs establish their own policies for Web accessibility, which are 
often more extensive those required by government policies."



> -----Original Message-----
> From: wai-eo-editors-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:wai-eo-editors-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sylvie Duchateau
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 10:10 AM
> To: wai-eo-editors@w3.org
> Subject: [Business case]: some typing mistakes
> 
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> here are some typing mistakes found in the suite business case.
> 
> 1. In overview, introduction, second paragrap: "There is an 
> initial cost
> 
> for organziations implementing Web accessibility;" typing mistake in 
> organizations.
> 
> 2. Several times on the overview page we find the word: accessibilty.
> 
> Also two times in social factors.
> 
> 3. In technical factors:
> In paragraph: "Identifying Technical Factors for a Specific 
> Organization". Typo error: first list fourth bullet: "be 
> prepared for advanced Web 
> technologies? provide future-compatibility of you 
> technology?" write your 
> technology.
> 
> 4. In financial factors:
> Bullet: How will the organization's specific Web site issues impact 
> on-going costs?
> Typing mistake in "content, such as providing captions for 
> the audio in 
> multimedia content. Similarly, the type of content and the 
> development and 
> testing environment in
> the organziation determines the impact of accessibility on 
> added (quality 
> assurance) testing time." organziation instead of organization.
> 
> 5. In policy page :
> introduction: Legal and policy factors apply differently to specific 
> organizations and situations. For example, one organization might be 
> required by explicit government
> regulations to make their Web sites accessible, while other 
> organization
> 
> follows the Web accessibility policies recommended by its 
> trade association 
> and regulations to make their Web sites accessible, while other 
> organization follows the Web accessibility policies 
> recommended by its 
> trade association and
> required by a partner company." Isn't it: "while other organizations 
> follow.. their" or "while another organization follows?".
> 
> 
> 6. In section: "Identifying Legal and Policy Factors for a Specific 
> Organization" bullet: ". @@ think this needs to be a section 
> below & not a 
> question@@ Is it helpful to include the risk of failing to provide 
> accessible Web sites?"
> action for not complying with requirements for Web 
> accessibility. Sometimes 
> the legal requirements for an organization might not be 
> clear. In such cases, some organization determine that it is 
> in their best interest (financially 
> and otherwise) to make their sites accessible, rather than risk legal 
> action. correct: some organizations determine.
> 
> 7. In section "industry and Non-Governmental Organization 
> (NGO)" it seems 
> that a word is missing in sentence in second paragraph: "Many 
> corporations 
> and NGOs establish their own policies for Web accessibility, 
> which are 
> often more extensive those required by government policies."
> 
> Regards
> 
> Sylvie 
> 
Received on Monday, 12 April 2004 23:34:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:13:10 GMT