On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 14:35, Kynn Bartlett wrote: > On Maccessibility.com, I've started an intermittent series on Safari's > status with regards to UAAG. Hi Kynn, This is too weird: I was reading it when suddenly this message appeared in my inbox. Were you watching me? <grin> This is a nifty annotated UAAG 1.0 evaluation of safari. I like your editorial comments like "Huh?" and "Whew!" <big grin>. Thanks for doing this. I'm thinking about linking to it from the UAWG home page. Do others have thoughts on that? _ Ian > It's not a full analysis as per > http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/10/eval -- since Safari is still in the > "public beta" stage -- but it hopefully will be read by the developers > at Apple and could have some effect on the discussion of what should go > in Safari next. > > Here's what's been published on Maccessibility so far: > > OBEY UAAG, Part 0: Understanding UAAG > http://www.maccessibility.com/archive/000595.php > > OBEY UAAG, Part 1: Configuring Safari > http://www.maccessibility.com/archive/000596.php > > --Kynn > > -- > Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com > Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com > Author, CSS in 24 Hours http://cssin24hours.com > Inland Anti-Empire Blog http://blog.kynn.com/iae > Shock & Awe Blog http://blog.kynn.com/shock -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447Received on Thursday, 29 May 2003 15:01:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:11:10 GMT