Ray Whitmer wrote: > > This seems to have gotten lost when I sent it before. > > The DOM WG has reviewed the UAAG, and has the following issue / comment: > > We believe that 6.5 should require the HTML DOM in addition to requiring > the core DOM. The reason for this is that there are certain current > values or states of forms that are not available through the core DOM, > but only through the HTML DOM. This might be, for example, the value in > a text field after the user has typed in it. These states might prove > significant for an accessibility agent. The core DOM does not deal with > the state of the presentation, but only the content that was actually in > the info set of the document, and the DOM WG never continued work on the > Views module to provide alternative ways to access this sort of > information. Ray, Thank you and the DOM WG for reviewing the spec. Your issue has been entered as issue 545 [1] for consideration by the UAWG. Thank you, _ Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-lc4#545 -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2002 17:20:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:51:11 GMT