W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: Issues and comments arising from UA evaluations

From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:22:26 -0600
To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF2F05117F.A1CE8A29-ON86256B7A.00802337@raleigh.ibm.com>
OK.


Rich Schwerdtfeger
Senior Technical Staff Member
IBM Accessibility Center
Research Division
EMail/web: schwer@us.ibm.com

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -
I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.",
Frost



                                                                                                                                        
                      "Ian B. Jacobs"                                                                                                   
                      <ij@w3.org>              To:       Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS                                         
                                               cc:       w3c-wai-ua@w3.org                                                              
                      03/12/2002 02:54         Subject:  Re: Issues and comments arising from UA evaluations                            
                      PM                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                        



Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:

> Where were these comments at proposed recommendation?
>

Hi Rich,

The good news is that I've been using the document
with a lot of different developers and we haven't seen
any really major issues. On the other hand, because
the document continues to be scrutinized, it's only
natural for people to request clarification. For instance,
Tantek Celik has now reviewed the document in depth
with me on 3 occasions for a total of about 20 hours
of work. Each time we find a few things that require
clarification, but less and less. The major principles
seem quite stable; the comments below are largely
just requests for clarification.

  -Ian



--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 18:22:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:51:03 GMT