W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

Raw minutes from 29 March 2001 UAWG teleconference

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:03:47 -0500
Message-ID: <3AC3A333.87606552@w3.org>
To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
29 March 2001 UA Guidelines Teleconference

Agenda announcement:
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0522.html

Reference document 23 March 2001 Guidelines:
 http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/WD-UAAG10-20010323

Minutes of previous meeting 22 March:
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0495.html

Next meeting: 5 April teleconference:

Present: 
 Jon Gunderson (Chair), Ian Jacobs (scribe), Gregory Rosmaita, 
 Mickey Quenzer, David Poehlman, Harvey Bingham, Denis Anson
 Tim Lacy, Rich Schwerdtfeger 

Absent: Aaron Leventhal, Jim Allan

Regrets: Charles McCathieNevile, Eric Hansen

-------------
Announcements
-------------

JG: New list for issues that will be considered in the next version of
    the guidelines

  http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-new.html

----------
Discussion
----------

1.Issue #468: 11.3 (single-key binding): "At least a majority" minimal 
requirement needs review
  http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#468

JG: One proposal: just require single key for default functionalities.
JG: Or - anything that you can do with single key+modifier you have to
    do with a single key alone.
IJ: I think that CMN's proposal was "a majority of the physical
    keyboard".
JG: How do you know how many keys the physical device has?
    (APIs hide this information from you).
GR: There's a javascript call where you can eliminate functionality
    that way (navbar = "")

IJ: The problem is when the number of keys and the number of
functionalities don't add up to 50% (one of the other).

Resolved: 

 - Minimal requirement of 11.4 is to have single key bindings for
   at least all of what's in 11.5.

 - Add a Note to encourage developers to supply a bunch of single key
   bindings AND that most functionalities should be available
   for single-key bindings.
 
 - Add technique: mention that entering a special mode (e.g, via one
   key) and having single key bindings after that is also useful.

2.Issue #467: Checkpoints 3.2/3.7: User needs to be able to toggle off 
              as well as on (e.g., for a user with a
              cognitive disability).
  http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#467

  JG: Toggle-off functionality is a new requirement. You can achieve
  this (with more difficulty) by reloading. My preference is to
  add this requirement to the techniques document.

  DA: My only problem with that approach is if refresh changes point
  of regard.

  IJ: I think preserving POR is useful for refresh.
 
  JG: IE, Opera, NN all maintain POR when you refresh.

  DP: Loading time is also an issue. Another technique: when you
  toggle one one, you automatically toggle the other one off.

  GR, TL: I think that P3 requirement is fine for this document.

  TL: Developers will instinctively think of "off" when they 
  think of "on".

  Resolved: 
  
   - Add a P3 requirement for 3.2, 3.7 to toggle off
     what has been toggled on.

   - Add to techniques of 9.4 to maintain POR after refresh.

3.Issue #449: Create an executive summary for UAAG 1.0
  http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#449

 IJ: This will be part of the spec.

 JG: Please send editorial comments if you have any.

 Resolved:
  - Include "summary" as appendix in UAAG 1.0.

4. New navigation features:

 GR: Work for me!

5. Input modality and G9 checkpoints
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0537

 Resolved: 
  - "Any event handler" means any handler, whatever device
     you conform for.

  - Move to Guideline 1: 9.3.

6. Adopt 508 definition of AT?
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0535

  HB: Yes.

  Resolved:

     - Add 508 definition to end of our definition (as
       an example of a more general definition).

  DP: Should we include definitions from other companies?

  Action IJ: Talk to Judy about this one as well.

  Action HB: Talk to EO about getting "How do people with
             disabilities use the Web".

7. Two glossary comments
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0524

  Resolved:

   - Proposed definition of "documentation" is ok.
   - Ok to delete document source view as proposed.

8. Checkpoints interdependent
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0515

  Resolved:

   - Adopt proposal (with editorial changes).

9. Comments based on GL comments:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0549

   
a) Should we add "If all else fails, implement some API to 6.6"?

  JG: Not sure that it's relevant. But maybe on portable devices,
  for example.

  DA: E.g., I can install a keyboard API in my Palm pilot that's not
  there initially. Palm makes one API. The one I have is "GoType!"

  Proposed (for example):

   - 6.3 For markup languages other than HTML and XML, provide
   programmatic access to content. Per 6.5, use standard APIs
   of if not std API exists, provide access through some API.

  DP: If you provide programmatic access that's not useful to ATs,
  then it doesn't serve the purposes of the document.

  GR: The requirement would be: if you use a proprietary API, then it
  has to be publicly available.

  Resolved: 
    - For 6.3, 6.4, 6.5: 
       * Use standard APIs to achieve the requirement of the checkpoint.
       * If no standard API exists, the user agent must satisfy this
         checkpoint using a publicly documented API.

  Resolved:
    - Ian can fix labels "For content/UA" for 10.2

  Resolved:
    - For checkpoint 3.2/3.7:
      "When placeholders are rendered, allow the user to view the
       original author-supplied content associated with each
       placeholder."

  Resolved:
   - Adopt change to 4.6 "at least the range of positions".

  Resolved:
   - Leave 9.2 a P2 since not impossible.
   - Add a note that UA should also allow reverse navigation.

5.Vote to go to last call

The following participants approve going to last call:
 
 Jon Gunderson, Ian Jacobs, Gregory Rosmaita, Mickey Quenzer, David
 Poehlman, Harvey Bingham, Denis Anson, Tim Lacy, Rich Schwerdtfeger

4.Last call scheduling options

 IJ: We can either go 10 April or 17 April.

 Resolved: Go to last call on 10 April 2001.

-- 
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2001 16:03:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:38 GMT