W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > October to December 2000

AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Teleconference 14 December 2000

From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:26:57 -0600
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20001213122453.026d3a50@staff.uiuc.edu>
To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
WAI UA Telecon for December 14th, 2000

Chair: Jon Gunderson
Date: Thursday, 14 December 2000
Time: 2:00 pm to 4:00 pm Eastern Standard Time, USA
Call-in: Longfellow Bridge (+1) (617) 252-1038

Agenda

Review Action Items (see details below)

Announcements

    1.Next User Agent face-to-face meeting in Boston on 1-2 March 2001

    2.W3C representatives respond to WAI requirement documents

    3.Glosary group formed in WCAG

Discussion

    1.Issue #405: Checkpoint 4.17: Need stronger requirement to distinguish 
selection/focus
      http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#405

    2.Issue #406: Checkpoint 4.18: Lower to Priority 3
      http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#406

    3.Issue #407: Checkpoint 4.20: Include requirement to control automatic 
closing of viewports
      http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#407

    4.Issue #408: Checkpoint 4.20: Allow configuration to prompt to open, 
not force manual open.
      http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#408

    5.Issue #409: Checkpoint 4.20: If frames are not opened, what is result?
      http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#409

    6.Issue #410: Checkpoint 4.21: Is this redundant to 4.20?
      http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#410

    7.Issue #411: Checkpoint 4.21: Not just for GUIs but for any interface 
with overlapping viewports
      http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#411

    8.Issue #412: Checkpoint 5.8: Editorial association between first and 
second sentences.
      http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#412

    9.Issue #413: Checkpoint 6.2: Does this only apply to content?
      http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#413

   10.Issue #414: Checkpoint 7.3: Need stronger min requirements
      http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#414

Action Item Summary

Open Action Items

    1.WG: look for user agents that implement mouse events like mouse over 
with the keyboard.

    2.IJ: Follow up with Greg Lowney on issue 389

    3.IJ: (Issue 387) Propose new wording for check point 8.4 reflecting 
discussion on 28 November

    4.IJ: Ask Jason White for CSS implementation information for emacspeak

    5.IJ: Publish new implementation report for the meeting

    6.IJ: Improve wording of note for 4.14 related to CSS reference

    7.IJ, EH, AG: Propose new definitions forterms in question 
(equivalence, text element, etc.)

    8.IJ: Draft new language for 6.2

    9.IJ: Get wording from Martin for thisrequirement (e.g., "conform", 
"implement", etc.) for issue 327

   10.IJ: Propose new checkpoints to see how it feels to harmonize the 
requirements related to comments in issue 348.

   11.IJ: Propose new checkpoints/modifiedcheckpoints for 8.2.

   12.IJ: Add some more explanation about the difference between 7.3 and7.4.

   13.IJ: Proposed fixed wording for 7.5

   14.IJ: Add to techniques a link to Adobe's accessible PDF information.

   15.IJ and AG: Revise the applicability provision and send to WG.

   16.IJ: Ask Adobe why this is hard (issue 382)

   17.IJ: 1.4 needs to be re-written in light of changes in checkpoint 1.1.

   18.IJ: Proposed text in 2.1

   19.IJ: Add a note to 5.8 - content requirements may also apply to user 
interface

   20.IJ: Mention that resizing and overiding absolute values is part of 
some specification in section 1.2

   21.IJ: Clarify the meaning of system colors

   22.IJ:
      a) clarify "recognize style" in checkpoints 4.5
      b) need more rational - refer to WCAG - style less important than 
other content
      c) add note 4.5 - give example of multimedia content that can be 
recognized as style

   23.IJ: Add technique to checkpoint 4.12 to make clear that:
      - This includes author-override if speech engine allows.
      - This includes whatever granularity offered by speech engine.

   24.IJ: Add a clarifying note to 4.11 that if you allow independent 
control of all sources of audio, you satisfy the checkpoint
as well.

   25.JG: Implementation information for guideline 2

   26.JG: Propose a list of things we areexpecting UAs to recognize in 
scripts.

   27.JG: Schedule face-to-face time with other WGs

   28.JG: Talk to Cindy King about captioning

   29.JG: Propose text for the techniques document about synthesized speech 
implementation issues. Notably UA and AT wanting to use the same 
synthesizer engine.

   30.JG: Write a proposal to the WG this week for a checkpoint about 
discerning focus from selection all the time

   31.AG: Send a reply to Phill related to issue 362

   32.GR: Review checkpoints in Guideline 10 for implementation information

   33.GR: Talk to Håkon about CSS support.

   34.GR: Talk to AFB about captioning and positioning

   35.JA: Review checkpoints in Guideline 4 for implementation information

   36.JA: Review SMIL players to find out which ones support positioning of 
captions.

   37.MQ: Send more details about control of speech parameters for the 
techniques document based on OpenBook.

   38.KB: Submit technique on providing information on current item and 
number of items in search

Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
MC-574
College of Applied Life Studies
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820

Voice: (217) 244-5870
Fax: (217) 333-0248

E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu

WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2000 13:25:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:22 GMT