> However, shouldn't Lynx implement the accessibility features > of HTML like other browsers? As for the DOM requirements, the > WG has reinforced their presence in the document several occasions. I gather that for HTML, compliance cannot be asserted to an older version of the language, e.g. to HTML 3.2 ? For DOM, since lynx is closer to a command line filter than it is to a real interactive application, the connection to DOM is dubious. Could a couple [lynx + some separate libDOM] meets the checkpoint ? In which case, since a libDOM exists somewhere one click away from the lynx download page, this would just be a packaging issue.Received on Monday, 13 November 2000 09:01:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:22 GMT