W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Document 'content' includes all element types and attributes (yes/no?)

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:44:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
cc: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0004261243360.19486-100000@tux.w3.org>
Well, there are cases (such as reverse-engineering scripts) where it is only
useful to sherlock holmes - particularly in cases of author error that is
beyond the capability of a User Agent to repair.

Charles

On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, William Loughborough wrote:

  CMcCN:: "But there is no reason why this should typically be presented
  to the user."
  
  WL: "typically...presented" may not be as important as "entirely
  available/accessible". If a "discovery tool" can't find out what the
  author "had in mind" then neither can a "user". The important thing IMHO
  is that whatever means is used to convey semantics not be only available
  to Sherlock Holmes.
  
  -- 
  Love.
              ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
  http://dicomp.pair.com
  

--
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001,  Australia 
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2000 12:44:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:03 GMT