Re: Document 'content' includes all element types and attributes (yes/no?)

Well, there are cases (such as reverse-engineering scripts) where it is only
useful to sherlock holmes - particularly in cases of author error that is
beyond the capability of a User Agent to repair.

Charles

On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, William Loughborough wrote:

  CMcCN:: "But there is no reason why this should typically be presented
  to the user."
  
  WL: "typically...presented" may not be as important as "entirely
  available/accessible". If a "discovery tool" can't find out what the
  author "had in mind" then neither can a "user". The important thing IMHO
  is that whatever means is used to convey semantics not be only available
  to Sherlock Holmes.
  
  -- 
  Love.
              ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
  http://dicomp.pair.com
  

--
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001,  Australia