W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2017

Re: upgrading standard browsers UI

From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 12:26:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAdDpDYJ1+Cb7dwSYRr3ULjYUpCwZV1PF-+jA7xOyA61v+MNTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Cc: w3c WAI List <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
That was a simply brilliant response Chaals...

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:05 AM, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
wrote:

> On 06/09/17 06:21, Sean Murphy (seanmmur) wrote:
>
>> This is a long shot and just a thought. Does anyone know if W3C standards
>> or the browser vendors are going to expand the current default UI elements
>> from the current one’s? My thinking is including a  menu, treeview, slider,
>> toolbar, etc.?
>>
>>
> HTML has not been controlled by W3C for many years now.
>
> My reading of the philosophy at the time they lost control is that most of
> these are presentational variations on HTML lists, so should not be
> reflected in HTML.
>
> Whilst WHATWG seems to see HTML as a GUI platform, rather than a document
> markup language, the issue they might have is that one of their primary
> tenets is that pages (whether compliant or not) should look and behave the
> same on all browsers.  That would mean that such controls would need to
> replace any similar controls provided by the underlying GUI platform.
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2017 16:27:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 6 September 2017 16:27:05 UTC