W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2015

Re: Poor contrast on focus indicator: SC 2.4.7 failure?

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 12:58:47 -0500
Cc: Wayne Dick <waynedick@knowbility.org>, IG - WAI Interest Group List list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
Message-Id: <02A0E9D7-E310-4F30-99A6-C3C0E8B92567@raisingthefloor.org>
To: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net
that would be an excellent place if you can get it in there.

Make it a required option though (e.g. most provide a mode  —— or — must provide at least one mode of operation — or …)  
or the designers at the browser mfgrs will fight it. 


Gregg Vanderheiden

> On May 24, 2015, at 12:56 PM, deborah.kaplan@suberic.net wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2015, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>> Poor contrast of the focus indicator was a pet peeve of mine. But we were unable to get it into WCAG - partly because it was seen as a User Agent issue and partly because it can be addressed by CSS or AT
> Should this be proposed as a clarification / amendment to UAAG 1.3.1, which *does* govern how user agents display the focus indicator?
> Deborah Kaplan
Received on Sunday, 24 May 2015 17:59:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 25 May 2017 01:54:15 UTC