W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2013

(unknown charset) Re: Creating an accessible Table of Contents

From: <accessys@smart.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 14:45:37 -0500 (EST)
To: (unknown charset) Olaf Drümmer <olaf@druemmer.com>
cc: (unknown charset) "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com>, Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.1303011443440.6155@cygnus.smart.net>

scanned paper documents without tags or other access features to allow 
them to be used by all is missing the goal.  I am not saying anything is 
better than the other as long as they can be used by all.

universal access is the goal.

Bob


On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, [iso-8859-1] Olaf Drmmer wrote:

> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 18:33:30 +0100
> From: "[iso-8859-1] Olaf Drmmer" <olaf@druemmer.com>
> To: accessys@smart.net, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> Cc: "[iso-8859-1] Olaf Drmmer" <olaf@druemmer.com>,
>     "[iso-8859-1] Ramn Corominas" <listas@ramoncorominas.com>,
>     Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
> Subject: Re: Creating an accessible Table of Contents
> 
> Hi Bob,
>
> you are moving the target a bit too quickly for my taste. A few minutes ago you scolded PDF for being a cheap electronic print out mechanism, now you bring scanned PDFs into the game.
>
> So are you implying, HTML (or some other format) is a better format for scanned paper documents?
>
>
> Olaf
>
>
> Am 1 Mar 2013 um 18:15 schrieb accessys@smart.net:
>
>>
>> I agree pdf has made great strides but getting archivist especially to tag the documents they scan is getting harderd and harder it seems
>>
>> Bob
>
>
Received on Friday, 1 March 2013 19:46:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 1 March 2013 19:46:18 GMT