W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

From: <accessys@smart.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:03:28 -0500 (EST)
To: Harry Loots <harry.loots@ieee.org>
cc: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, "ANDERSEN, Leon" <Leon.Andersen@fahcsia.gov.au>, Adam Cooper <cooperad@bigpond.com>, W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.1212181102310.8553@cygnus.smart.net>

Amen!  WORLD_WIDE web for all PWD if at all possible

Bob


On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Harry Loots wrote:

> On 18 December 2012 07:52, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca> wrote:
>
>> However, as long as these anti-JS users insist on using a tool that does
>> not support JavaScript, even when other viable options exist, then they are
>> in the "want" versus "need" category, and I do not personally believe that
>> WCAG 2 or any legislated requirement for equitable access is being ignored
>> or trampled upon. (But, as the kids say today, "haters are gonna hate")
>
>
> There are no anti-JS users here; no haters. Just people who are trying
> their best to make the web a universal, inclusive web whom all people may
> benefit from.
>
> Kind regards, Harry
>
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 16:04:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 December 2012 16:04:24 GMT