W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

From: Harry Loots <harry.loots@ieee.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:05:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CA++-QFc4gMxJZy=O=3Xax61rq_qPDr3gxhZpwuDRFPavavr1VQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
Cc: "ANDERSEN, Leon" <Leon.Andersen@fahcsia.gov.au>, Adam Cooper <cooperad@bigpond.com>, W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On 18 December 2012 07:52, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca> wrote:

> However, as long as these anti-JS users insist on using a tool that does
> not support JavaScript, even when other viable options exist, then they are
> in the "want" versus "need" category, and I do not personally believe that
> WCAG 2 or any legislated requirement for equitable access is being ignored
> or trampled upon. (But, as the kids say today, "haters are gonna hate")


There are no anti-JS users here; no haters. Just people who are trying
their best to make the web a universal, inclusive web whom all people may
benefit from.

Kind regards, Harry
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 09:06:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 December 2012 09:06:04 GMT