RE: Keyboard & Youtube and Pause Stop Hide

Many thanks Pierre for your timely questions for this issue has often bugged
me.

 

Increasingly video material from youTube is being embedded  into pages and
although it is generally fine with IE, there are problems with other
browsers. From an accessibility perspective this requires balancing the need
to make things accessible against the danger of placing the bar so high that
fewer people will bother trying, a dilemma I suspect we will be increasingly
facing.

 

YouTube has made the process of providing captions (in English at least) so
much easier that I don't think  web developers and site owners can really
consider this to be a problem any longer. However, the lack of keyboard
access to the Flash controls with some browsers (and the tendency to trap
the keyboard) will be a problem for some keyboard users.

 

Also thanks Pierre for your accessible youtube controls
http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/info.aspx?page=2260 

 

I noticed Ohio State University also has done some work on accessible
controls http://wac.osu.edu/examples/youtube-player-controls/ 

 

Do either of these overcome the problems you raise?

 

Roger

 

From: Pierre Frederiksen [mailto:Pierre.Frederiksen@visionaustralia.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2012 4:10 PM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Keyboard & Youtube and Pause Stop Hide

 

Hi

 

I would be great to hear your opinion on these two (finer?) points regarding
WCAG 2.0 conformance:

 

2.1.1 Keyboard

Currently the standard Flash YouTube player is not keyboard accessible in
Firefox, Chrome and Safari. Only Internet Explorer provides keyboard access
to the content.

Does this mean that the standard YouTube player fails this Success Criteria
or is this a question of browser capability and not the responsibility of
content creators?

The Flash technique for providing keyboard access 
www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100708/flash.html#FLASH17
only works for Firefox

 

2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide

Consider a slide show that automatically changes the slide and does so
continually until the user intervenes. The slideshow contains buttons that
can be used to change to each of the slides (e.g. buttons 1,2,3,4,5)

Should an explicit pause button (either with the word Pause or with the
pause symbol) be provided, or is it sufficient if the slideshow stops the
automatic movement as soon as one of the slide selector buttons has been
clicked?

 

The WCAG "Understanding" document states:

 

"For a mechanism to be considered "a mechanism for the user to pause," it
must provide the user with a means to pause that does not tie up the user or
the focus so that the page cannot be used. The word "pause" here is meant in
the sense of a "pause button" although other mechanisms than a button can be
used. Having an animation stop only so long as a user has focus on it (where
it restarts as soon as the user moves the focus away) would not be
considered a "mechanism for the user to pause" because it makes the page
unusable in the process and would not meet this SC."

 

.       It states that 'other mechanisms" than a button can be used.

.       The reason that the focus solution is rejected is not that is
doesn't have an explicit pause button, but that is unusable (because if you
focus on other content the slideshow starts again).

So you would think that if the slideshow stops once one of the slide
selector buttons has been pressed it is OK?

 

Thanks heaps

Cheers

Pierre

 

 

 

  _____  

Did you know Vision Australia provide a Web Accessibility consultancy,
training and testing services to help organisations make their online
services accessible to as wider user base as possible. To find out more
visit www.visionaustralia.org.

ABN: 67 108 391 831 ACN: 108 391 831

Vision Australia is a partnership between people who are blind, sighted or
have low vision. We are united by our passion that people who are blind or
have low vision will have access to and fully participate in every part of
life they choose.

This email (including its attachments) is confidential and may contain
legally privileged material or personal information. If you are not a named
addressee you must not use, disclose, copy, disseminate or print the email
or any information in it. If you have received this email in error please
notify us immediately and delete the email and any copies.

Vision Australia is not responsible for any changes made to a document other
than those made by Vision Australia or for the effect of the changes to the
document's meaning. Vision Australia accepts no liability for any damage
caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interference,
interception, corruption or unauthorised access.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 21:04:26 UTC