W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2012

RE: approval

From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:23:26 -0500
Message-ID: <f0e7b34393aeca47063e52831e1f059b@mail.gmail.com>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
RE: approval

ō  We are listing right now which are the most important criteria for
impaired vision.

Yes, and donít forget about people with multiple disabilities that may use
multiple modes of interaction such as deaf and blind.



Jonathan



*From:* Carla De Winter [mailto:carla@accesscapable.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 22, 2012 9:13 AM
*To:* 'Jim Tobias'; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
*Subject:* RE: approval



Maybe set up a list of personas?

We are listing right now which are the most important criteria for impaired
vision.

May I remark that visual processing is also part of this, some people have
a perfect sight but still use the same techniques. I have been one of them.

Best regards,

Carla De Winter

AccessCapable

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Jim Tobias [mailto:tobias@inclusive.com <tobias@inclusive.com>]
Verzonden: woensdag 22 februari 2012 15:01
Aan: 'Cain, Sally'; 'G F Mueden'; 'Marc Haunschild'; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Onderwerp: RE: approval

Thanks Sally and all.

I think we would agree that there are gradations of vision loss across

several dimensions. More to the point, there's a continuum of accommodations

and techniques that people use for reading, from "only screen

magnification/contrast" to "only screen reading", with at least some people

using both at the same time. And of course the settings for these 2

modalities also vary, both by person and by situation, such as the specific

task they are performing at the moment, their expectations of comfort,

productivity, accuracy, etc.

To me, one big problem we face is that we don't know how many people are in

each slot along these continua. How do we justify this or that

recommendation if we don't know how many people it will benefit, or how many

people would be left behind?

(Of course, there's an even bigger problem lurking behind this one that pops

out whenever we think about numbers: why are so many people using nothing?

There's no evidence than more than a tiny fraction of potential users with

disabilities are taking advantage of the mainstream and AT accessibility

features and products out there.)

***

Jim Tobias

Inclusive Technologies

+1.908.907.2387 v/sms

skype jimtobias

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Cain, Sally [mailto:sally.cain@rnib.org.uk <sally.cain@rnib.org.uk>]

> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 8:24 AM

> To: G F Mueden; Marc Haunschild; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

> Subject: RE: approval

>

> Dear George,

>

> I would just like to comment on your statement "all the blind are

> equally blind". I think it is important to note that this is not the

> case. Someone who considers themselves blind may have light perception.

> They may also have a tiny amount of vision, even if it may not be very

> useful. I think it is important to recognise that every single persons

> vision is different, even those people who have the same eye condition,

> so we can make no assumptions about what someone can or cannot see.

>

> I hope this is helpful.

>

> Thanks

> Sally

> Digital Accessibility Development Officer

> Royal National Institute for Blind People (RNIB)

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: G F Mueden [mailto:gfmueden@verizon.net <gfmueden@verizon.net>]

> Sent: 22 February 2012 12:56

> To: Marc Haunschild; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

> Subject: Re: approval

>

> Marc, please amend your category list  to point out the vast difference

> between those who don't see and those who don't see well; their needs

> are

> quite different and what helps one group is often of no help to the

> other.

> Further, while all the blind are equally blind, there is variety in the

> needs of those who still read with their eyes but not well.

> Typically they suffer from (1) poor acuity (sharpness of focus) and (2)

> poor

> contrast sensitivity (ability to distinguish between shades of colors or

>

> grays).  A third difficulty is small field size, not so prevalent but

> important.

>

> The fix for #! is generally only half known.  Everybody knows about

> magnification.  The other part is the need for word wrap to keep copy on

> the

> screen.   Without it every line must be chased to its end, scrolling

> right

> and then left for the start of the next line.

> The fix for #2 is not magnification (often suggested), but is choice of

> font

> for incoming text.  Poor contrast sensitivity calls for thicker strokes

> in

> the lines that make the characters, so the use of bold fonts is the fix.

>

> User's software can provide them, but formatting can prevent their use.

> Magnification help only a little.  A bigger faint character is still

> faint.

>

> Enough.  To learn more, "Accessibility for Eye Readers". 12k and

> growing, is

> available as an email attachment from gfmueden@verizon.net

> Commentts welcome.

>

> George   ===gm===

>

>

>

>

>

>

> .

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: "Marc Haunschild" <mh@zadi.de>

> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 1:06 AM

> Subject: Re: approval

>

>

> | Hi Meliha,

> |

> | Simple question, simple answer. There are four categories of problems,

> | people might have using a website

> |

> | vision

> | hearing

> | movement

> | cognition

> |

> | can be less than average or (partially) non-existent (like the ability

> | to see colors or to see with just one eye).

> |

> | Some things, which can be a challenge in real life, do not influence

> the

> | usage of a website a lot: like sitting in a wheel chair.

> |

> | I think this is clear. So just try to understand what needs have

> people

> | which cannot see. Can they use your site? How? It is quite easy to

> | support them: they use screenreaders, programs that read your content.

> | You have to provide ALL the content as text (also what is on your

> | pictures). Now disable your css and look at your pages: everything

> | should be linearly ordered in just one dimension: from top to bottom.

> | Make sure, that the content is provided in the correct order: does it

> | still make sense? Or do you use phrases like:  on the left you see...

> -

> | which is nonsense now, because there is no left or right ;-)

> |

> | Try this with other disabilties. What is a problem for people that

> | cannot move very good: if they cannot put there arms way up in the

> air,

> | its propably no problem to use a mouse and keyboard, but if they have

> a

> | tremor, its very difficult for them to klick on tiny buttons and

> icons.

> |

> | With this approach you can find out a lot about your own site. If you

> | like exoeriments: Just try to use your page with your feet instead of

> | hands, wear glasses for watching 3d-movies (these with green and red

> | "glass")

> |

> | And further just use your imagination.

> |

> | One thing which is difficult to understand: people whonever were able

> to

> | hear, normally do not speak even the language of there own country.

> They

> | use gestures for communication. So they cannot read your texts - at

> | least only with big difficulties. So try to keep your sentences short,

> | remain essentially, just write, like everybody should write anyway:

> | there are a lot of descriptions/tutorials out there in the web, How to

> | write texts.

> |

> | You will see - all of this improvements will help everybody to use

> your

> | site - like already saif here: accessibility ist usability for

> everybody.

> |

> | Good luck with your site!

> |

> | Am 20.02.2012 10:59, schrieb Meliha Yenilmez:

> | > Hi Everone,

> | >

> | > I have two questions.

> | >

> | > First one, I want to learn our web site is accessible or not? How

> can

> | > our web site approval for accessbile or no?

> | >

> | > And second one, if our web page/pages is accessible,  who can give

> | > conformance logo/s?

> | >

> | > Thanks for all,

> | >

> | > *Meliha Yenilmez*

> |

> | Marc

> |

>

>

>

>

>  To report this e-mail as Spam, please forward it to:

> spam@mailcontrol.com

>

>

> --

> February is Service Matters month! We're showcasing travel, shopping and

> money providers that are giving blind and partially sighted people great

> customer service. We're also launching our new 'Guide to getting great

> service'. Find out more at www.rnib.org.uk/servicematters

> --

>

> DISCLAIMER:

>

> NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is

> confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended

> recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the

> content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the

> sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it

> and any attachments from your system.

>

> RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by

> its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, it

> cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.

> We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

>

> Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and

> any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent

> those of RNIB.

>

> RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

>

> Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk

>

>

>

> This message has been scanned for viruses by Websense Hosted Security -

> http://www.websense.com/content/HostedEmailSecurity.aspx
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 14:23:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 February 2012 14:23:59 GMT