W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: UPDATE suggested alternatives to accessible version

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:32:24 +0000
Message-ID: <4F4026F8.3060905@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Carla wrote:

> http://www.hassellinclusion.com/2011/12/accessibility-myths-2011/

Were these examples of how not to write universal pages?

Dark green on grey in the tabs: almost zero colour contrast.

Light green on white in the body text, also a poor colour contrast, but 
not nearly as bad.

Large areas of white space on the first two screenfuls; I presume it 
only works in one browser.

Centre justification in the print version - at least they do have a 
print version and it doesn't go off the edge of the paper.
-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 22:32:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 February 2012 22:32:56 GMT