W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: any suggested alternatives to accessible version

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:21:44 +0000
Message-ID: <4F3CBC98.6010901@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Marc Haunschild wrote:


> 
> link the word "accessible" to wikipedia:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessible
> 

If you do that you will have to resort to something like Click here for 
the actual link to the accessible site.  "accessible" needs to be part 
of the link name to that site.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 08:22:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 16 February 2012 08:22:17 GMT