- From: Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:25:25 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 2/16/12, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk> wrote: > Marc Haunschild wrote: >> >> link the word "accessible" to wikipedia: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessible >> > > If you do that you will have to resort to something like Click here for > the actual link to the accessible site. "accessible" needs to be part > of the link name to that site. +1 to what David says here about the word "accessible" (or its alternative) more needing to be part of the ultimate link and not a secondary redirect most likely coming before the actual accessible link.. Speaking as a "sighted" user with notably degenerating cognition, I've encountered this exact type of situation and have in fact ended up totally confused.. My brain locked in on that first link that was *well-intended* but instead was so distracting, the author's "real" message lost significant footage/merit in the brain fog that incidentally occurred.. Kind of the Internet's version of the distractible "something shiny".. :)) Cindy-Sue :) - :: - http://www.welovebirds.org/profile/BackyardPishing Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA ~
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 10:25:57 UTC